What follows is a simple proposal to help them share the risk (and rewards) with their workers.
It has features in common with the government’s Higher Education Contributions Scheme (HECS) in which university students get help with fees in return for making their own contribution when (and if) circumstances allow.
Recently a variant has been suggested for farms, whose income is notoriously variable and unsuited to conventional loans with regular repayment schedules.
Farm businesses would borrow from the government or banks and make repayments when conditions permitted. It would cost taxpayers much less than subsidies or grants.
Employers could ‘borrow’ from workers
We are proposing the same sort of arrangement between employers and employees.
Universities, for example, might consider revenue-contingent salary reductions as an alternative to redundancies.
All staff or staff at risk of being made redundant might be offered a 10% salary reduction that would be refunded by the university when (and only if) its revenue bounced back by a agreed amount in the future.
If the university’s fortunes did bounce back, the staff affected would be repaid the income they lost.
Such a scheme would support employees at risk as did JobKeeper, while maintaining the employeer-employee relationship as did JobKeeper.
It ought to work in all sorts of enterprises.
For many, jobs matter more than income
Wellbeing and life satisfaction are often more dependent on job security than they are on salary, suggesting that many people would be willing to trade-off one for the other.
Introduced through enterprise bargaining and policed by Fair Work Australia, such an arrangement might well be a win-win for workers and the enterprises they work in.
Authors: Robert Costanza, Professor and VC's Chair, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University