Australia improves on global corruption rankings, but there is still work to be done
- Written by A J Brown, Professor of Public Policy & Law, Centre for Governance & Public Policy, Griffith University
Australia has turned the corner on its decade-long slide on Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index[1] (CPI), once again ranking in the top ten least corrupt countries in the world. The fresh ranking comes just ahead of a federal election, which will determine the future of many key anti-corruption reforms.
In the latest 2024 index, Australia rose two points to a score of 77 on the 100-point scale. The index is the world’s most widely cited indicator of how countries are faring in controlling corruption in government.
The result confirms a positive trend, placing Australia back in the top 10 countries for the first time since 2016. It now sits at equal 10th alongside Iceland and Ireland.
In 2012, Australia was ranked as the 7th least corrupt country in the world, with a score of 85 out of 100. But by 2021 it had fallen to a score of 73[2] and 18th place on the index.
With that fall widely attributed to a decade of complacency and foot-dragging on efforts to bolster integrity in government, the confirmed recovery is a major affirmation of reforms of the past three years. It also highlights some stark choices for policymakers heading into the 2025 federal election.
The best – and worst – places for corruption
Globally, Denmark again tops the index with a score of 90, followed by Finland on 88. The most corrupt countries in the world are Venezuela (10), Somalia (9) and South Sudan (8).
However, the global outlook is highly challenging. Over the past ten years, many more countries have now declined significantly in their anti-corruption scores (47 countries) than have improved on the index (32 countries).
Australia’s recovery is therefore now bucking a negative trend, including the “integrity complacency” still affecting many other developed countries. The United Kingdom (71/100) and United States (65/100) have now fallen to their own lowest-ever scores on the index.
The index is compiled from 13 independent surveys of professional and expert perceptions of public sector corruption across the world. Nine sources were used to inform Australia’s result – including include Freedom House, the World Justice Project and the World Bank’s Executive Opinion Survey.
Two sources had Australia still declining, including the global academic-led Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project[3]. However, six sources rate Australia as improving, led by the Economist Intelligence Unit’s[4] assessment, conducted most recently in September 2024.
Australian reforms are making a difference
There’s now little doubt that the federal integrity reforms of the past three years are a major reason for Australia’s new direction of travel. These include the creation of the National Anti-Corruption Commission[5] in 2022, as well as the long overdue strengthening of Australia’s foreign bribery laws in 2024. A renewed commitment to the global Open Government Partnership[6], much of the response to Robodebt, and measures to strengthen merit in public appointments, such as replacement of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, have also helped.
Long overdue anti-money laundering laws[7] were also introduced late in 2024, beyond the time frame for data collection for the latest index. While the impact of these on expert opinion will be known in the future, they highlight that much of the business of Australia’s anti-corruption “catch up” is unfinished and ongoing.
The result poses a challenge for any policymakers suffering under the illusion that Australia’s integrity systems are somehow “fixed”.
From an international perspective, Australia is yet to move to control secret and sham company ownerships – the major vehicle used to hide bribes and stolen public money. This is despite championing transparency in the beneficial ownership of companies since hosting the G20 in 2014.
The need to bring transparency and integrity to federal political donation and funding laws[8] continues to overshadow the last weeks of the 47th parliament. Negotiations between the major parties have failed to inspire confidence among independents, and much of the public.
Effective control of undue influence in decision-making, pork-barrelling, professional lobbying and “revolving door” jobs for politicians and public servants are ongoing challenges.
And in a clear signal to both the Labor government and the Coalition, a team of cross-benchers, led by independent Andrew Wilkie[9], have introduced a bill to establish a Whistleblower Protection Authority. This remains the single biggest gap[10] in Australia’s integrity system and the most major anti-corruption reform still needed.
Even before Australia hit its 2022 low, some leaders were softening citizens up to accept a reduced position on the index. In 2018, Coalition Attorney-General Christian Porter claimed Australia had remained “consistently in the top 20 countries on Earth for low corruption”. This prompted independent Rebekha Sharkie to point out that Australia had fallen from the top ten: “the trajectory is not good[11]”.
By contrast, Labor leader Anthony Albanese[12] went into the last election accusing the Morrison government of dragging Australia down on corruption, and promising Labor would do better. He said:
The health of our democracy, the integrity of our institutions, the transparency and fairness of our laws, the harmony and cohesion of our population. These aren’t just noble ideals. They are a powerful defence against the threat of modern authoritarianism.
Amid the challenges, there is hope. The federal parliament’s reform record of the past three years is clearly a big step in the right direction.
However, the climb back to 77 on the Corruption Perceptions Index shows it’s clearly just the first step in securing Australia’s reputation as a democracy that protects itself against undue influence and abuse of power.
References
- ^ Corruption Perceptions Index (transparency.org.au)
- ^ fallen to a score of 73 (theconversation.com)
- ^ Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project (www.v-dem.net)
- ^ Economist Intelligence Unit’s (www.eiu.com)
- ^ creation of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (theconversation.com)
- ^ Open Government Partnership (www.opengovpartnership.org)
- ^ anti-money laundering laws (transparency.org.au)
- ^ political donation and funding laws (theconversation.com)
- ^ cross-benchers, led by independent Andrew Wilkie (www.sbs.com.au)
- ^ the single biggest gap (theconversation.com)
- ^ the trajectory is not good (research-repository.griffith.edu.au)
- ^ Anthony Albanese (www.lowyinstitute.org)
Authors: A J Brown, Professor of Public Policy & Law, Centre for Governance & Public Policy, Griffith University
