New Zealand is reviving the ANZAC alliance – joining AUKUS is a logical next step

The National-led coalition government is off to a fast start internationally. In envisioning a more central role for the ANZAC alliance with Australia, and possible involvement in the AUKUS^[1] security pact, it is recalibrating New Zealand’s independent foreign policy.

At the inaugural Australia-New Zealand Foreign and Defence Ministerial (ANZMIN^[2]) meeting in Melbourne earlier this year, the focus was on future-proofing the trans-Tasman alliance.

Detailed discussions took place on the defence and security aspects of the relationship. This included global strategic issues, the Indo-Pacific region, and the relevance of the partnership in the Pacific.

But the stage for this shift in New Zealand’s independent foreign policy had already been set by the Labour government in 2023.

In his foreword to the country’s first National Security Strategy^[3] last year, then prime minister Chris Hipkins wrote that New Zealand “faces a fundamentally more challenging security outlook”. The strategy document called for a “national conversation on foreign policy”.

Christopher Luxon’s administration is taking the logical next step by increasing cooperation with Canberra.

In or out of AUKUS?

New Zealand’s independent foreign policy emerged in the mid-1980s from the debris of the ANZUS alliance. It flourished in a historically rare era of muted great power rivalry and unprecedented economic globalisation.

It is abundantly clear that our holiday from history is over.

New Zealand’s independent foreign policy has to be redefined in response to present strategic circumstances rather than past interpretations, however well they may have served us. These historic positions, recently put forward^[4] by former National leader Don Brash and former prime minister Helen Clark, have run their course.

Read more: The defence dilemma facing NZ's next government: stay independent or join 'pillar 2' of AUKUS?^[5]

At the sharp end of this recalibration is AUKUS, the technology partnership involving Australia, the UK and the US. New Zealand has expressed an interest^[6] in participating in “pillar two” of the agreement, involving non-nuclear technology sharing.

A joint statement^[7] released after the ANZMIN consultations stated that AUKUS was discussed as “a positive contribution toward maintaining peace, security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific”.

The Chinese embassy in Wellington has expressed “serious concerns”^[8]. It called AUKUS:

a stark manifestation of Cold War mentality [which] will undermine peace and stability, sow division and confrontation in the region, and thus runs against the common interests of regional countries pursuing peace, stability, and common security.

Few neutral observers will be persuaded by Beijing’s characterisation.

Labour on the fence

AUKUS emerged in 2021, initiated in Canberra as a response to economic and diplomatic sanctions imposed on Australia by China in 2020.

New Zealand’s participation will invariably strengthen the ANZAC alliance. It is hard to see how non-involvement will not weaken that alliance.

This is something the Labour opposition will need to consider carefully. Having asked for a national foreign policy conversation while in government, it is now signalling disquiet over AUKUS membership.

Read more: The AUKUS pact, born in secrecy, will have huge implications for Australia and the region^[9]

Labour’s Foreign Affairs Spokesperson David Parker said recently^[10] that “we’re questioning [AUKUS’] utility and whether it is wise”. His associate spokesperson Phil Twyford told parliament AUKUS is an “offensive war-fighting alliance against China”.

It is unclear how this position is consistent with Labour’s progressively stronger support for the ANZAC alliance and AUKUS since 2021, and its earlier willingness to explore participating in pillar two.

The future of independent foreign policy

Truth be told, the Luxon administration’s interest in AUKUS is a consequence of China serving as the architect of its own strategic problems.

Before the Beijing Olympics in 2008, China enjoyed a generally positive relationship with a range of countries across Asia and the Pacific.

Since then, China’s relations with numerous regional states have deteriorated, in no small part due to actions initiated by Beijing in the South China Sea^[11] and East China Sea^[12], its contested border with India^[13], and sanctions on Australia^[14] and South Korea^[15] for disagreements over Chinese foreign policy decisions.

Read more: As Australia signs up for nuclear subs, NZ faces hard decisions over the AUKUS alliance^[16]

New Zealand is committed to advancing its interests in a way that contributes to regional stability in what the ANZMIN joint statement described as “the most challenging strategic environment in decades”.

If New Zealand’s elected government determines that AUKUS is in the national interest, then it must seek the broadest consensus possible domestically. It also needs to unapologetically pursue that path internationally.

That is the essence of foreign minister Winston Peters’ response when asked whether Wellington’s interest in AUKUS would negatively affect relations with China:

China is a country that practises something I have got a lot of time for – they practise their national interest […] and that’s what we’re doing.

We are entering a new era for New Zealand’s independent foreign policy, one that includes a rebooted ANZAC alliance, with a possible AUKUS dimension.

References

1. ^{^} AUKUS (www.cfr.org)
2. ^{^} ANZMIN (www.rnz.co.nz)
3. ^{^} National Security Strategy (www.dpmc.govt.nz)
4. ^{^} recently put forward (www.nzherald.co.nz)
5. ^{^} The defence dilemma facing NZ's next government: stay independent or join 'pillar 2' of AUKUS? (theconversation.com)
6. ^{^} expressed an interest (www.reuters.com)
7. ^{^} joint statement (www.beehive.govt.nz)
8. ^{^} expressed “serious concerns” (www.rnz.co.nz)
9. ^{^} The AUKUS pact, born in secrecy, will have huge implications for Australia and the region (theconversation.com)
10. ^{^} David Parker said recently (www.rnz.co.nz)
11. ^{^} South China Sea (www.theguardian.com)
12. ^{^} East China Sea (apnews.com)
13. ^{^} contested border with India (www.bbc.com)
14. ^{^} sanctions on Australia (foreignpolicy.com)
15. ^{^} South Korea (www.japantimes.co.jp)
16. ^{^} As Australia signs up for nuclear subs, NZ faces hard decisions over the AUKUS alliance (theconversation.com)