Israel is accelerating its creeping annexation of the West Bank. Can Donald Trump stop it?
- Written by: Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern Studies, Australian National University; The University of Western Australia; Victoria University
While the world is focused on the fate of a ruined Gaza, Israel has accelerated its creeping annexation of the West Bank.
Israeli legislative moves, security operations, settlement expansion and support of settlers’ violence are forcing the Palestinians out of their lands at an unprecedented rate.
US President Donald Trump has publicly opposed[1] Israel’s annexation of the occupied territory, but he may not be able to stop it – unless he acts now and acts decisively.
Creeping annexation
Last July, the Israeli parliament (Knesset) passed a resolution[2] in support of the annexation of the West Bank. It was non-binding, but clearly signalled where the legislative body stood on the issue.
Then, when US Vice President JD Vance was visiting Israel in October, the Knesset approved two bills[3] calling for the formal annexation of the territory. Vance called the move[4] a “very stupid political stunt” intended to embarrass him.
The bills were aligned with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s avowed opposition[5] to the creation of an independent Palestinian state on his watch.
Then, earlier this month, the Israeli security cabinet approved[6] a series of measures[7] that furthered the de facto annexation of the West Bank.
The measures, pushed by the far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, and Defence Minister Israel Katz, are designed to remove any “legal obstacles[8]” to the expansion of Israeli power across the territory, in violation of international law.
The measures provide more immunity for Israelis – the settlers, in particular – to purchase and own land[9] in the West Bank.
They also give the Israeli state control over some historical and religious sites and limit further the Palestinian Authority’s administrative functions in the zones that are supposed to be under its jurisdiction under the 1993 Oslo Accords[10].
Netanyahu’s broader ambitions
The moves came at a crucial time in US-Israel relations. In January, the Trump administration announced the start[11] of phase two of the US-brokered ceasefire in Gaza. Immediately after the measures were approved, Netanyahu made his sixth visit to the United States[12] in a year to ensure Trump remains aligned with his course of action.
Netanyahu wants the fate of the Gaza Strip to be shaped according to his vision of Israel’s interests. He has been very vocal about his ambition for a “Greater Israel[13]” stretching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.
Netanyahu also remains adamant Israel stays the most powerful actor in the region. Israel has already degraded the capabilities of Hamas and Hezbollah, the two main regional proxies of its chief adversary, the Islamic Republic of Iran. It has also widened its military footprint in both Lebanon and Syria.
Now, Netanyahu is determined to see a favourable regime change[14] in Tehran. While Trump wants a deal with Iran over its nuclear program, Netanyahu is significantly less supportive[15] of such an outcome.
He has repeatedly stressed[16] the need for a US-led military campaign to not only dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, but also degrade its missile capability and force it to severe ties with its proxies.
He regards this as the only way to remove the “existential threat” posed by the Iranian regime.
What will Trump do?
The new Israeli measures in the West Bank will no doubt embolden settlers to engage in more violent acts against the Palestinians. The stories coming out of the territory[17] show how Israel is rapidly slicing away the Palestinian’s territorial, social and cultural existence.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) says more than 37,000 Palestinians[18] were displaced in the West Bank in 2025, with record-high levels[19] of violence.
The United Nations and the European Union have strongly condemned[20] the new Israeli measures and settler violence.
However, Netanyahu and his extremist ministers have, as usual, brushed aside international criticisms and ignored the illegality of Israeli occupation under international law[21].
They have instead accelerated efforts to make the internationally backed two-state solution an impossibility. The recent measures help establish deeper “facts on the ground[22]” that render the annexation of the West Bank a fait accompli. This would give Trump no other option but to go along with it.
Yet, Trump has the power and leverage to restrain Netanyahu. And he can stand firm behind his own stated opposition[23] to West Bank annexation.
As an unpredictable, transactional leader, the president may even go so far as to attack Iran on behalf of Netanyahu in return for Netanyahu holding back from formal annexation of the West Bank.
Trump now faces the biggest tests of his presidency. The first is how he will manage Netanyahu, whom he has praised as a “war hero[24]”. The second is how he will settle the conflict with Iran – whether it will be a deal or yet another devastating war.
References
- ^ publicly opposed (www.aljazeera.com)
- ^ passed a resolution (www.timesofisrael.com)
- ^ approved two bills (www.cbsnews.com)
- ^ called the move (www.cbsnews.com)
- ^ avowed opposition (www.timesofisrael.com)
- ^ approved (www.dw.com)
- ^ series of measures (israelpolicyforum.org)
- ^ legal obstacles (www.aljazeera.com)
- ^ purchase and own land (www.dw.com)
- ^ 1993 Oslo Accords (theconversation.com)
- ^ announced the start (www.bbc.com)
- ^ sixth visit to the United States (www.aljazeera.com)
- ^ Greater Israel (theconversation.com)
- ^ favourable regime change (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ significantly less supportive (www.dw.com)
- ^ repeatedly stressed (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ stories coming out of the territory (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ more than 37,000 Palestinians (www.aljazeera.com)
- ^ record-high levels (press.un.org)
- ^ have strongly condemned (www.eupac.org)
- ^ illegality of Israeli occupation under international law (www.bbc.com)
- ^ facts on the ground (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ stated opposition (www.timesofisrael.com)
- ^ war hero (www.nytimes.com)
Authors: Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern Studies, Australian National University; The University of Western Australia; Victoria University
